-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Divisional Court dismissed the Notice of application for Judicial Review on January 22, 2018 which also served and filed including the Notice of Constitutional Question. The City even did not disclose the few records related to discriminated the applicant in the job that order by the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario.
Please see the reply against the notice of dismiss; affidavit# http://bit.ly/2Ecypp5
The applicant Charter Rights infringed, or denied by the City. He is under the ‘Impugned Restrictions’, and victim, falsely convicted, so called "Regulatory offense" by the secret Court which operating by the City of Toronto Municipal Board. The applicant believe this Municipal Board total controlled by the secret society/ deep state. As a result, the applicant has been deprived in the form of stereotypes activates, discrimination in jobs, invasion of privacy which the main cause of his historic disadvantage, and existing prejudice. In the doing so, the applicant seriously prevented to proving his innocence’s as well as discrimination in jobs and ending his victimization.
The applicant provided all evidences to the Information Privacy Commissioner of Ontario (IPC) that the City of Toronto performing and sponsoring the program which the applicant is the victim.
In the applicant's appeal, the IPC withheld almost all the City's presentation and in the Order of Colin Bhattacharjee, the Honourable Adjudicator of the IPC dated October 23, 2017, clearly said;
'no need to maintain procedural fairness in this case’ , also said, I do not have the authority to order the city to provide an individual with a job or to stop the city or the police from investigating or allegedly harassing someone, furthermore said: ‘ the City provided sufficient detail about the contents of the records held by the city’s legal services division to enable me to fully and properly adjudicate this order’, but withheld all those submissions in the name of so called confidentiality and thereafter all related records from the applicant.
In this order the IPCO order the City to disclose few records that related to the discriminated the applicant's in City job , the City did not disclose it.
It is very clear matter in this appeal that the IPC are not able to exercising statutory power/duty in the subject matter related to this appeal and/or the IPC has no jurisdiction related to this subject matter.
The applicant question is; how the vast number of people will get justice when it caused of racial profiling/discrimination and/or victimization in the different level of government but the IPC do not have the jurisdiction and/or can not able exercise of the statutory power or duty for those individual and the IPC Order is included Privative clause ?
It is also raised question, how the lawyer of the City of Toronto pursuant the application to the Divisional Court where the applicant challenged it in Constitutional Question that afford the defence of qualified privilege to a lawyer who, acting on behalf of a clients in the territory of invalid law and/or unconstitutional government act, within the fraud/scam and/or stereotyped activities. That blocked the appellant’s constitutional rights which destroying the applicant’s reputation, financial sustainability, extensive manner of harassment, caused of historical disadvantage due to including, discriminated job with the City, damages, and disrespectful to the public interest manner?
Please see the Notice of application for Judicial Review; https://goo.gl/uKVstk and the Notice of Constitutional Question; https://goo.gl/hyXrgH
No comments:
Post a Comment