---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The applicant question is, how the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the leave to appeal application which is criminal case, an automatic right to appeal? Is there any influences of deep state?
Application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada against the Toronto Community Housing Corporation dismissed on November 23, 2017; http://bit.ly/2A3iqu1
The applicant submitted his documents for a motion to the Supreme Court of Canada for reconsideration of the application for leave to Appeal but was not accepted # http://bit.ly/2CVqr26
The applicant Charter Rights infringed, or denied by the Toronto Community Housing under the City program. He is under the ‘Impugned Restrictions’, and sanctioned "Regulatory offense" by the City Municipal Board. As a result, the applicant is the victim in the mind control and experimentation that facilitated by the Toronto Community Housing by equipping his home through the installing cellular Antenna, high EMF, other hidden surveillance and mechanism that create noise equipment also facilitated to supply drug/ chemical through water and air.
He has been deprived in the form of stereotypes activates, discrimination in jobs, invasion of privacy which the main cause of his historic disadvantage, and existing prejudice. In the doing so, the applicant seriously prevented to proving his innocence’s as well as discrimination in jobs and ending his victimization.
The inspector issued a certificate that there is an cellular antenna installed in the roof of the applicant house. This antenna has been producing huge radio frequency in the whole apartment which is the main tools for the mind control and experiments. The home also equipped as torture chamber with the installing of various kind of torture equipment's.
It is absolutely criminality and beyond of the constitution of a state that breach the applicant's charter right & other people. The applicant believe this kind restriction/ sanction approve by the secret Court and/or administrative sanction by the City. Sanction approve for the applicant upon false evidences as a result of that he is subjected for these horrific harassment. The applicant already provided the proves that all records produced by the TCHC, Bangladeshi Canadian Community Services (BCS), Doctor Arif and all other parties in the applicant's name, completely false and stereotypes.
So the applicant case should categorized a criminal case. Even any Privacy Right Lawyer and/or designated lawyer can verify the applicant's ‘Impugned Restrictions’ status in this regard. In the issue of criminal, it is an automatic right to appeal. Though the applicant has submitted his application in the form of leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada as he is a self-represented and acting in this case without any legal help.
Document Application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada;
Please see the Notice to leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada; http://bit.ly/2i1hM9l
Memorandum of Argument, the Supreme Court of Canada; http://bit.ly/2Diy47b
Document Application of reconsideration, leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada:
Affidavit ; http://bit.ly/2DahWAs
Statement of Argument; http://bit.ly/2mLV5VL
Case brief;
The Information and Privacy Commissioner dismissed the appellant appeal against Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) in the withheld ( bundles of records) all records under solicitor-client privilege without any categorized of the documents and without any clarification, legal test and/or production of recods. The IPC also dismissed the appellant's request for reasonable search without seeking any valid evidence from the TCHC that they did reasonable search. Where the appellant submitted direct evidences that the TCHC holds investigative records including health records related to the appellant. It is absolute in this appeal that the IPC does have the authority to exercise power/duty and/or they do have the jurisdiction to make the relief for the appellant. It is also proves by decision of the Divisional Court.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appellant Notice of appeal against TCHC and IPC in the saying that :
(1) There is no merit for appeal to the Divisional Court.
(2) The appellant has no right to appeal to the Divisional Court against the IPC decision.
(3) The IPC has no jurisdiction what the appellant is seeking reliefs.
Please see the decision of the Divisional Court ; http://bit.ly/2uv5k2X
The appellant submitted leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal against the decision of the Divisional Court. Because if the IPC has no jurisdiction about the reliefs of the appellant and the IPC decision has a Privative clause. On the other hand the Honourable Judge commented that the appellant has no rights to appeal to the Divisional Court.
The Divisional Court has absolute jurisdiction to hear an appeal, where the administrative tribunal court decision has a privative clause include matter related to questions of law and fact that established in the many Supreme Court decisions.
Though the appellant has been depriving in the legal help since long but the materials of the leave to appeal were well-established with respect of the facts , Rule, precedents and the Canadian Charter. Please see the Factum of the Appellant for leave to appeal:http://bit.ly/2tXRYPR
The Court of Appeal for Ontario released the Endorsement in a two line without hearing the case that the leave to appeal dismissed but are not releasing the reasons. But the Appellant would like to submit leave to appeal to the Supreme Court that need the reasons for judgement.
CONCLUSION
How the Supreme Court of Canada dismiss the application for leave to appeal? and what is the logic behind this dismissal decision?
Where the case is both way criminal; 1st the applicant's convicted " Regulatory offense" (Criminal) by the secret Court of City Municipal Board and secondly the applicant is victim in crimes. This case stands on public interest clearly and, other than the direct evidences, the TCHC itself acknowledged the applicant's victimization in their submission.
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms clearly defined; s. 1, s. 2 (a), s. 2 (b), s. 7, s. 8 , s. 15 , s.24(1), and s. 32, s. 32(1);
Section 52(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982 states that any law that is inconsistent with the
provisions of the Constitution is of no force or effect.
The applicant would like to know; how the Tribunal/ Court took their decisions in the dismissing the applicant that clearly violates rights mentioned above.
Did the Courts have the laws that no need to follow the Canadian Constitution for certain people and/or group?
No doubts, every Tribunals, Courts has own Rule, Law for judgment and for directing the proceedings. I strongly believe, any one can't ignore the Principles of Natural Justice:
"The judgment must be based on evidence".
Though the rule, law and procedures of the Tribunals/ Court are complicated sometimes. It is true. In the most cases a professional lawyer need to perform in the cases. But in the presence of clear evidences, any case can not be dismissed. It is a very clear message. If it happens, it will establish - Rule of Power instead of the Rule of Law and corruption will take place... no doubt at all!
It is already established and proves from the decision of the Tribunal/Courts that the applicant has no right for justice!
The main objectives for these Tribunal and Courts to ensure justice for the people;
"Not only must Justice be done; it must also be seen to be done."
If otherwise it must be named as biased and the estimator is said to be biased.
Natural justice is terminology for the rule against bias and the right to a fair hearing, it has largely been replaced and extended by the general "duty to act fairly".
The applicant believe the reason of dismisses his case leveled National Security at the result of the influence of the deep state. Who are they? If they not being arrested more Canadian will be under mind control & experimentation e.g. military- aliens hybrid agendas, no doubts at all.
One thing is very crucial that the TCHC lawyer acknowledged about applicant's victimization in their submission to the Supreme Court of Canada. In this way, the applicant believe, the lawyer just trying to escape from the possible allegation in the future that might be raised against the lawyer's professional duty. But still they know that the applicant will not win. Because the applicant is a very little file and they are the extreme large one. Which they/ allies has all secretive symbolic back door communications in the everywhere.
On the other hand, mind control experimentation victims case never win in Canada, the matter is not like that# http://www.wanttoknow.info/mkcourtcase . Also previously Canadian government negotiated with the many victims outside of the Court.
In the recent, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice rules in the favor of the mind control experimentation victims case that the case represented by the prominent lawyers: "Doctors tortured patients at Ontario mental-health centre, judge rules"# tgam.ca/2rZWCL5
In the applicant's case, the proceeding were related to the records rather than claim damage. At last, where the TCHC acknowledged about the applicant's victimization. There is still question then why the Supreme Court of Canada dismisses this case? The quote of Honore de Balzac might absolutely right:
'Laws are spider webs through which the big flies
pass and the little ones get caught.'
-----------------------
